Month: August 2024

“The film which you are about to see is an account of the tragedy which befell a group of five youths, in particular Sally Hardesty and her invalid brother, Franklin. It is all the more tragic in that they were young. But, had they lived very, very long lives, they could not have expected, nor would they have wished to see as much of the mad and macabre as they were to see that day. For them an idyllic summer afternoon drive became a nightmare. The events of that day were to lead to the discovery of one of the most bizarre crimes in the annals of American history, The Texas Chain Saw Massacre.” When I joke about movies being very loosely based on a true story, that opening dialogue from John Larroquette and the wild popularity is what I’m referring to. While it may not be the first movie to falsely present itself as a true story, it’s one of the most famous and certainly the most famous early example in the realm of horror. I’ve joked about it enough but lets actually take a good look at what, if anything, resembles truth from one of the best to ever do it. Don’t pick up any weird looking stray hitchhikers as we find out what REALLY happened to The Texas Chainsaw Massacre (watch it HERE).

Tobe Hooper was an assistant director and documentary cameraman at the University of Texas at Austin in the early 1970s. He came up with ideas for a movie involving isolation, darkness, and the woods but, like the gang from A Clockwork Orange, felt that he needed a bit of the old ultra violence. He felt that way when he was astonished to see the graphic violence shown on the news coming out of San Antonio. He then based his killer or at least some of the aspects of the killer on Wisconsin’s Ed Gein who was convicted in the 1950’s. Now, here’s where the tricky part comes in. Hooper puts in the beginning of the movie a bit about the movie you are about to see is true and that was an intentional deception. The Vietnam War, Watergate, and the Oil Crisis of 1973 were all moments in time that the general public was lied to about and his cinematic misinformation was his response.

Hooper wasn’t alone though as he co-wrote the script with the co-writer of his first film Eggshells Kim Henkel. While Hooper based the story crimes very loosely on Ed Gein, Henkel was more interested and astonished with the story of Elmer Wayne Henley who was involved in what came to be known as the Houston Mass Murders. Henley helped lead nearly 30 young men and teenage boys to the home of Dean Corll over the span from 1970 to 1973 before Henley killed Corll allegedly in self-defense. What Henkel found interesting and something that he added to his characters was the lack of remorse and full ownership of their crimes. Henley, like the family that does the killing in today’s movie, completely owned his crimes and Henkel worked that into his portion of the screenplay.

Henkel was also the writer for Eaten Alive which was directed by Hooper and The Unseen from 1980. He would also go on to direct and write the 4th installment of the series Texas Chainsaw Massacre: The Next Generation. Yeah, that would end up being his only directorial effort. The cast for the movie was mostly local talent from stage, commercials, or TV or even just people that Hooper knew personally. Marilyn Burns wouldn’t end up making much after this but did show up in Eaten Alive and two other Texas Chainsaw movies while Gunnar Hansen would make a nice niche for himself in some fun horror movies like Mosquito, Campfire Tales, and Hollywood Chainsaw Hookers before a final Chainsaw appearance in the iteration from 2013. Probably the most famous on screen talent is just a voice. John Larroquette was an unknown who worked for weed and would end up doing the narration again for the remake, its prequel, and the 2022 Texas Chainsaw Massacre.

The Texas Chainsaw Massacre

The movie was a smash success with it making 30 million on its 80-140 thousand dollar budget but the people that actually made the movie didn’t reap the benefits as much as you would hope do to making a bad deal with bad people. It gained controversy as Hooper asked for a PG rating due to much of the gore being not expressly visible but it was instead slapped with an X before cuts dropped it to an R. It would end up as a video nasty and had some screening either flush with walkouts like San Fransisco or theaters threatened with citations and violations like in Canada. It remains one of the most successful independent films of all time as well as one of the best horror films ever made.

The movie opens with a camera snapping hard to see polaroids followed by a pile of body parts set up in a grisly fashion before we meet a group of friends that include Sally and her brother Franklin along with their friends Jerry, Pam, and Kirk. They are on the way to a property owned by Sally and Franklins family the Hardestys. They pick up a very strange hitchhiker who tries to sell them a photograph after mentioning that his family is in the animal slaughter business just like the Hardestys are. They refuse to buy the picture and the man cuts Franklin before being chased out of the van. He also cut his own hand and smeared blood on the side of the vehicle as it drives away.

(Factometer 5%) Ok look, we are going to try to make this interesting, but I was serious when I said this was the joke I use when saying movies that are purported true stories “aren’t as bad as Texas Chainsaw” when it comes to their validity. If you are looking at the Ed Gein side of things, there is really nothing here that is similar to what is seen on screen. He had a brother and a very strange and sad childhood upbringing. If you look at what Kim Henkel used as inspiration, there isn’t a ton that is familiar there wither with Henley either. He was one of four sons and I guess the fact that he was in Houston, Texas puts him in the same state as the film. The group of friends isn’t exactly lured into anything either like Henley was involved in. we will try to look at both inspirations throughout.

The van starts to run low on fuel but is told that the gas station has nothing left. They find an abandoned house owned by the family of Sally and Franklin but more importantly Kirk and Pam find a different nearby house that seems to be running off of a generator. Generator means gas and so the two go over to see about trading for some gas when we meet what we affectionately come to know as Leatherface when he is introduced to us by shocking killing Kirk with a hammer blow to the head. He is called Leatherface because he fashions a mask made of the skin of his victims. Pam goes looking for Kirk and stumbles into a room full of human and animal bones and skin along with feathers and other assorted atrocities before being hung on a hook and killed. A short time later, Jerry enters the house and befalls the same fate as his friends.

The Texas Chain Saw Massacre

(Factometer 25%) This may be the most accurate part of the movie to label based on a true story. For the Ed Gein side of things, what he ended up doing apart from killing AT LEAST 2 people, was dig up graves and use the skin and bones for various things. When the police finally apprehended him, they found, among other things, chairs covered by human skin, skulls on his bedposts, bowls made from human skulls, a human skin suit including leggings and corsets, and a female nipple doorbell. Gein had become so obsessed with his mother at an early age that he eventually wanted to become her and effectively crawl back inside her. Leatherface’s appearance as well as that room that Pam stumbles into area really the biggest parts that you could put together with Gein and even then, it’s not exactly apples to apples or I suppose bodies to bodies. The only similarity to Henley and the Houston Mass Murders is the number of victims there are. There is no confirmation how many people Leatherface and his family killed but it had to be a lot, the number that Henley was involved in was almost 30.

Sally and Franklin are all that remain when nightfall rolls around, and they are attacked with Franklin brutally killed in his wheelchair and Sally left to run through the woods. She makes it to the house where her friends were all killed where she sees an elderly body upstairs and is chased away to a gas station/food place. The owner drives her back to the house where we find that the hitchhiker, gas station owner, and Leatherface are all brothers, and the very much alive elderly man is their grandpa. Sally is to be killed with a hammer but when the family’s attempt to have the grandfather do it fails, and she escapes. When the hitchhiker and Leatherface chase her, the hitchhiker is killed after being struck by a truck and Leatherface is knocked down, injuring himself while Sally escapes in the back of truck screaming a mix of joy and insanity.

(Factometer 15%) Again, there isn’t much here. If you look at the Ed Gein side of things, he was alone in the acts that he committed and neither victim that he had while alive was able to escape. Gein was put in a mental hospital after a juryless trial where he would die in 1984 at the age of 77. The movie at least has a passing resemblance to the end of the Henley saga. While the main murderer Corll preferred men and teenage boys, Henley ended up bringing a girl to the house where the killings happened which made Corll turn on Henley. The woman in question while she was about to be murdered was able to convince Henley to stop and kill Corll and let them escape so we have a Sally avatar from real life. Henley called the police after two victims made it out safely and admitted to everything. Just like Gein and unlike Leatherface, Henley would not go on to have any sequels. He was tried for 6 murders of the boys he brought to Corll and he is still in prison today with his next parole opportunity being in 2025.

Well, we did it! We tackled the very untrue story of a purportedly true tale. Texas Chainsaw is still an all-time classic but if you want to watch anything based on the two inspirations for it to actually learn more you are much better off elsewhere. While there arent any big movies about the Houston Massacre, there was a loose adaptation called Freak Out from 2003. Gein has a few more options with the best being Deranged from 1974 but don’t sleep on the self-titled Ed Gein which is also known as In the Light of the Moon starring Steve Railsback from 2000. Nothing will ever take away from the original TCM even if some of its sequels tried their damnedest but if you’d like to explore the stories that inspired it, you best find another farm to explore.

A couple of the previous episodes of WTF Really Happened to This Horror Movie? can be seen below. To check out the other shows we have on the JoBlo Horror Originals YouTube channel, head over to the channel – and subscribe while you’re there!

The post The Texas Chainsaw Massacre (1974) – WTF Really Happened to This Horror Movie? appeared first on JoBlo.

Sigourney Weaver Ripley

Alien: Romulus closes out the summer with its success at the box office. The movie has been described as Fede Álvarez’s love letter to the franchise as a whole. And as the Venice Film Festival gets underway, the star of the first four movies in the Alien franchise, starting with the 1979 original, Sigourney Weaver is preparing to receive a Lifetime Achievement Award this year with her illustrious career. While she reflects on her career, which also includes being the romantic interest to Bill Murray’s Peter Venkman in the Ghostbusters movies, as well as her humorously antagonistic turn in Working Girl, Weaver talks about the groundbreaking sci-fi film that would solidify her as one of cinema’s greatest heroines.

Deadline spoke with Weaver on the eve of her award and she recounted what it was like to start production on Alien. She recalled, “I had come from off of Broadway. So to me, this was an ‘off of Broadway’ project. It was dark, unique, very original, very physically arresting. As soon as I saw the designs, when I met Ridley Scott and he showed me these [H.R.] Giger and Carlo Rambaldi designs, I realized I’d never seen anything like it before, so that really intrigued me. But I don’t think any of us could have anticipated that it would continue to entertain people in the way it has.”

Weaver then spoke about bringing Ripley to life during the filming of the first film, “What I remember most is Ridley and [director of photography] Derek Vanlint being very innovative in how they linked us all up in these tiny spaces. But I felt like a member of the crew the entire time — I’m glad I didn’t see it as a huge breakthrough opportunity. I always just looked for great stories and wanted to be a part of them, and that’s been my compass, rather than thinking about all the other aspects of the business.”

She also shares her gratitude for the fans holding Ripley at high esteem. And despite the less-than-stellar reception of the last two Alien films that she starred in, she was happy she got to revisit the character through other directors’ visions. “It’s true that Ripley kept living, which I’m happy about. It’s been a great ride. All those different directors and different stories and different evolutions of Ripley. But I was absolutely planning to run back to the theater as fast as I could once it was done!”

On the first film, Weaver also remembers discussing the internalization of her character with co-star Ian Holm, “On Alien, I felt that Ripley was improvising her way through this situation. And I think the most important decision I probably made was becoming good buddies with [co-star] Ian Holm. I remember saying to him very early on, ‘Gosh, do you think Ripley thinks what she’s doing is the right thing?’ And he said, ‘Oh, I do absolutely.’ I said, ‘I don’t. I don’t think she knows.’ So the whole time, I’m hoping I’m doing the right thing. I have no certainty about it, which puts your character into kind of a free fall that I think was very helpful for me.”

The post Sigourney Weaver reflects on Alien and Ripley as she prepares to receive a Lifetime Achievement Award from the Venice Film Festival appeared first on JoBlo.

The Walking Dead: Daryl Dixon

The Walking Dead spin-off The Walking Dead: Daryl Dixon (you can read our review HERE) is set to continue with a second season that will focus on Daryl’s good friend Carol, played by Melissa McBride – and because of that, the second season has the ridiculous (and ridiculously long) title of The Walking Dead: Daryl Dixon – The Book of Carol. The show is scheduled to premiere on Sunday, September 29 at 9pm ET/PT on both AMC and AMC+… and before the first episode of season 2 even makes it to air, season 3 has already started filming in Spain!

Norman Reedus, who has been playing Daryl Dixon since the first season of The Walking Dead, and McBride (who has been playing Carol just as long) celebrated the start of production on season 3 with a video that was shared on social media:

The first season of The Walking Dead: Daryl Dixon had the following synopsis: Daryl (Norman Reedus) washes ashore in France and struggles to piece together how he got there and why. The series tracks his journey across a broken but resilient France as he hopes to find a way back home. As he makes the journey, though, the connections he forms along the way complicate his ultimate plan.

The six episodes of the new season pick up where The Walking Dead: Daryl Dixon left off, following fan-favorite characters Daryl Dixon (Reedus) and Carol Peletier (McBride). They both confront old demons while she fights to find her friend and he struggles with his decision to stay in France, causing tension at the Nest. Additionally, Genet (Anne Charrier)’s movement builds momentum, setting Pouvoir on a violent collision course with the Union of Hope in the fight for France’s future.

In addition to Reedus, McBride, and Charrier, the show’s cast includes Clémence Poésy, Louis Puech Scigliuzzi, Laika Blanc Francard, Romain Levi, Eriq Ebouaney, and Manish Dayal.

Showrunner David Zabel serves as executive producer alongside Reedus, Scott M. Gimple, Angela Kang, Greg Nicotero, Brian Bockrath, and Daniel Percival. AMC Studios is producing.

Did you watch The Walking Dead: Daryl Dixon and are you looking forward to season 2 and season 3? Let us know by leaving a comment below.

The post The Walking Dead: Daryl Dixon season 3 is now filming in Spain appeared first on JoBlo.

With an unconventional filmmaker like Tim Burton, who has a specific vision and a known signature style, he’s been known to butt heads with movie studios. He’d suffer pushback after being given carte blanche on Batman Returns after parents found the film too disturbing and he didn’t get to return for a third film. His famous jettisoned film Superman Lives is one that’s still a sensitive issue for him. However, Tim Burton has gotten the chance to return to one of his earlier works as he revisits the strange world of Beetlejuice. And this revisit is one that revitalized him after feeling lost.

The Hollywood Reporter says the director was in high spirits at the Venice Film Festival, where the sequel Beetlejuice Beetlejuice is set to make its world premiere. Burton spoke on how the film was a return to his roots. He explains, “Over the past few years I got a little bit disillusioned with the movie industry, [I sort] of lost myself. For me I realised the only way to be a success is that I have to love doing it. For this one, I just enjoyed and loved making it.” He spoke about being improvisational with the making of the film, which is atypical of big Hollywood productions. Burton continued, “We did everything quickly. The things that usually take months we did quickly. We’d go buy a doll from a toy store and rip it up and put rods on it and do some stuff. That was the spirit, and it doesn’t always happen in films. It has it an energy and a personal nature to it that everybody contributed to.”

Burton would even encourage the actors to be improvisational. “Even the ending wasn’t written. We were playing with everything,” he confessed. And his excitement about returning to the fun of practical effects was something he’s been enthused about since the movie was filming, “It’s not going to win any Academy Awards for special effects, but it doesn’t matter.” The Edwards Scissorhands director would even admit that he approached this movie without even going back and revisiting the original. A curious move, considering Burton had long delayed making a sequel as he says he “never quite understood why it had been a success.”

Burton also cites working with Jenna Ortega on Wednesday as inspiration to find a narrative behind this movie, “And meeting [Wednesday star] Jenna [Ortega] obviously was such an important thing for me. Working with her and just thinking about the Lydia character and what happened to her 35 years later, and thinking about my own life, about what happened to get kids or relationships. It just became a very simple, emotional movie. It’s like a weird family movie, you know? It was never [about making] a big sequel for money or anything like that. I just wanted to make this for very personal reasons.”

The post Tim Burton speaks about being disillusioned with the film business before returning to his plucky roots with Beetlejuice Beetlejuice appeared first on JoBlo.

Plot: Sauron has returned. Cast out by Galadriel, without an army or ally, the rising Dark Lord must now rely on his own cunning to rebuild his strength and oversee the creation of the Rings of Power, which will allow him to bind all the peoples of Middle-earth to his sinister will. Building on Season One’s epic scope and ambition, the new season plunges even its most beloved and vulnerable characters into a rising tide of darkness, challenging each to find their place in a world that is increasingly on the brink of calamity. Elves and dwarves, orcs and men, wizards and Harfoots… as friendships are strained and kingdoms begin to fracture, the forces of good will struggle ever more valiantly to hold on to what matters to them most of all… each other.

Review: Two years ago, Amazon Studios’ massive investment in expanding J.R.R. Tolkien’s iconic fantasy epic debuted. The Lord of the Rings: The Rings of Power was a prequel set in the unexplored Second Age of Middle-Earth and introduced us to the days before Sauron rose to power. The first season ended with the shocking reveal that Halbrand was Sauron in disguise, and the second season was set on a direct path to Mordor going to war with the Elves, Humans, and Dwarves. With anticipation riding high, the second season is here. It does not disappoint with a stronger narrative, improved special effects, and a faster pace that should appeal to veteran Tolkien fans and newcomers alike. The Rings of Power finally finds some consistency in this much-improved sophomore run that eclipses the first season in every way.

Set thousands of years before The Lord of the Rings, The Rings of Power spent the first season introducing us to the various factions of elves, dwarves, halflings, and humans. The series gave us the first cinematic look at the land of Numenor, across the sea from Middle-Earth, as well as the origins of the Elves from their original home of Valinor. As the series chronicled multiple storylines at once, it only began to come together towards the end of the season after the forging of the first three rings, which drove a wedge between friends Elrond (Robert Aramayo) and Galadriel (Morfydd Clark). By the finale, many characters find themselves in different circumstances, especially Nori (Markella Kavenagh), the Harfoot guiding the magical and mysterious Stranger (Daniel Weyman), who may be the wizard we all know as Gandalf. As season two opens, there are still seventeen rings yet to be forged by Celebrimbor (Charles Edwards), but war is brewing amongst the orcs of Mordor, led by Adar (now played by Sam Hazeldine).

While only the first three episodes of the second season were made available for this review, they are packed with action and momentum that was lacking in the first season. The premiere episode begins with a flashback to the origins of Sauron leading up to his appearance in the first season, deepening his motivation to rule all of Middle-Earth. The first three episodes focus on multiple storylines without trying to fit too much into each hour-long chapter. Most of these first episodes focus on the rift between Elrond and Galadriel once they reveal that Hallbrand is Sauron. Gil-Galad (Benjamin Walker) entrusts the two Elvish leaders to try to stop Sauron and inform Celebrimbor of Hallbrand’s duplicitous nature. Both Morfydd Clark and Robert Aramayo deepen the motivations for their characters as they develop into the characters we know from The Lord of the Rings. This storyline also gives Celebrimbor attention, which shows how his quest to create the rings echoes the devolution of Gollum in later tales. It is fascinating to see take root; the actors all do immense work here.

The journey of Nori and The Stranger is also given ample screentime as their travels echo the Hobbit path in the Tolkien novels. While they have not yet revealed the name of the Wizard, his mannerisms become more familiar with each episode. This season also introduces other Wizards, known as Istari, some of whom we know from the movies and others making their first live-screen appearances. There are many familiar locations from Peter Jackson’s films that get a lot of exposure in these episodes, including Khazad-dum and the Mines of Moria, where Disa (Sophia Nomvete) and Durin IV (Owain Arthur) deal with the fallout of their friendship with Elrond as well as the fate of their realm. Numenor also gets focus as the power struggle there in the presumed death of Isildur (Maxim Baldry) looms over them. Meanwhile, Isildur finds himself across the sea and interacting with Middle-Earth.

So much of The Rings of Power is rooted in the ample appendices and historical records created by J.R.R. Tolkien, which showrunners J.D. Payne and Patrick McKay have taken to heart. This is a reverent adaptation with the majority of the first-season writing team back, along with a few new additions. The biggest changes this season include moving the production from New Zealand to England, something fans of the franchise met with disdain. But, I am glad to say the location shooting in the Canary Islands and the ample production budget never impacted the visual scope of the series. This season also brings back director Charlotte Brandstrom (The Witcher, Shogun). While Brandstrom helmed two episodes of the first season with J.A. Bayona on two and Wayne Che Yip helmed the remaining four, the veteran filmmaker directed or co-directed every episode this season with support from Sanaa Hamri and Louise Hooper. The consistency of the visuals this season is exceptional, and the series feels far closer to Peter Jackson’s approach than anything in the first season did.

The first season of The Lord of the Rings: The Rings of Power was met with a divisive response from fans, while critics were much more positive. I can understand how many were underwhelmed by the pacing of the first season and deviations from the source material. A significant amount of world-building needed to take place for the first season to create a foundation for an ongoing narrative, and I am impressed by how much stronger the series The Rings of Power is in season two. From the pacing to the character development alone, The Rings of Power is significantly better. The score by Bear McCreary remains solid, but everything else has improved. The vision of director Charlotte Brandstrom is consistent and epic, while the visual effects are superior in every way. If you rewatch the first season leading into the second, I am positive you will be wowed by how much better this series has grown in just one season. Without having seen the remaining five episodes of this season, I may reserve my judgment on how good this show is, but if the comparison between the first three entries in this season and the last, it is a night and day difference. The Lord of the Rings: The Rings of Power has found its stride and is ready to rule us all.

The Lord of the Rings: The Rings of Power‘s second season premieres on August 29th on Prime Video.

The post The Lord of the Rings: The Rings of Power Season 2 TV Review appeared first on JoBlo.

demi moore

1997’s G.I. Jane will forever be tied to one of the most infamous moments in Academy Awards history, when Will Smith slapped Chris Rock for taking a dig at Jada Pinkett Smith’s tight cut, using the Demi Moore movie part of the punchline. But it’s important to remember just what impact that movie had upon release. Outside of Sigourney Weaver, it was practically unheard of for a mainstream actress – especially one considered one of the most beautiful in Hollywood – to take the risk to shave her head for a role. But Moore saw the chance to play this character and ran with it with a tenacity that for too long has been overlooked.

Sitting down with Michelle Yeoh for Interview, Demi Moore remembered collaborating with her director and pushing herself in a way she never had before. “I loved working with Ridley on G.I. Jane. Probably one of my favorite experiences…And again, one that was very physical, and that pushed me so far out of my [comfort zone]…Yeah, and my baseline existence to this whole other world, another one that really posed a big question that at its core was like, why not? Why shouldn’t women be in combat?” (To tie Yeoh to Scott, she will be leading the series Blade Runner 2099, the latest in the series that Ridley Scott launched in 1982.)

Demi Moore added that female-forward action films have come a long way since G.I. Jane. “Being of the generation I’m from, I really wanted to find an action-oriented film, and I felt like the response I got was polite, but like I was crazy…And then I saw with the next generation of actresses, the world of action-oriented films opened up for them, which was uplifting and inspiring to see things changing.” Wait, we thought we had Jennifer Lawrence to thank for that…

G.I. Jane opened at #1 and stayed there for two weeks but ended up being an overall dud during its run. But Demi Moore is pretty damn good in it, earning plenty of praise upon release…despite a Razzie nomination that was probably only given because she looked different than she normally does.

Are you a fan of G.I. Jane? Do you think it gets enough credit in terms of female-driven action movies? Drop and give us your thoughts below!

The post Demi Moore says G.I. Jane helped women-centric action movies excel…Has it been given enough credit? appeared first on JoBlo.